<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peskind Family Law Insights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>If I Were King &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/if-i-were-king-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/if-i-were-king-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years I have mused on how I would improve both substantive and procedural rules in Illinois family law. The new “If I Were King,” blog posts shares a few of those thoughts.  This is the first in that occasional series. 
 
 
If I were king, I would change the Illinois law requiring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/if-i-were-king-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Family Law Section Publications Board Meets in New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/aba-family-law-section-publications-board-meets-in-new-orleans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/aba-family-law-section-publications-board-meets-in-new-orleans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently returned from a meeting in New Orleans with the ABA Family Law Section Publications Board. The ABA Family Law Section publishes a multitude of practical books for family law attorneys. Recent publications include “Premarital Agreements, Drafting and Negotiation” by Linda Ravden and “The Forensic Accounting Desk Book: A Practical Guide to Financial Investigation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/aba-family-law-section-publications-board-meets-in-new-orleans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome Back!</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/welcome-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/welcome-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last year, I have devoted virtually all of my non-work time to the preparation of my book, “The Family Law Evidence Handbook” to be published by the American Bar Association Family Law Section Publications this spring. Having completed that project, I am ready to get back to regular contributions to Peskind Family Law [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/welcome-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Risks of Recording: Why Eavesdropping Won’t Help Your Divorce Case</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/the-risks-of-recording-why-eavesdropping-won%e2%80%99t-help-your-divorce-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/the-risks-of-recording-why-eavesdropping-won%e2%80%99t-help-your-divorce-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Guest Blogger:  Gregory C. Maksimuk
In a day and age when communications can be easily intercepted or recorded, it is important to be aware that doing so could expose you to criminal and/or civil liability. The Illinois eavesdropping laws, 720 ILCS 5/14-1 et. seq., prohibit a person from intentionally using any device to hear, record, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/the-risks-of-recording-why-eavesdropping-won%e2%80%99t-help-your-divorce-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deepening the Divide Between the Districts on Post-Divorce Appellate Jurisdiction –  In re marriage of A’Hearn</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/deepening-the-divide-between-the-districts-on-post-divorce-appellate-jurisdiction-%e2%80%93-in-re-marriage-of-a%e2%80%99hearn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/deepening-the-divide-between-the-districts-on-post-divorce-appellate-jurisdiction-%e2%80%93-in-re-marriage-of-a%e2%80%99hearn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

 

By Guest Blogger:  Gregory C. Maksimuk
Synopsis: On March 21, 2011, the Third District Appellate Court decided In re the Marriage of A’Hearn.    Perhaps most significantly, A’Hearn resolves the issue of how the Third District handles post-judgment appellate jurisdiction under Rule 304(a) in dissolution of marriage cases when more than one motion is pending.  This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/deepening-the-divide-between-the-districts-on-post-divorce-appellate-jurisdiction-%e2%80%93-in-re-marriage-of-a%e2%80%99hearn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sucks for him!</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/sucks-for-him/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/sucks-for-him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subsequent events have revealed that the plaintiff’s retention of the Madoff account in the division of the parties’ assets and for three years thereafter was improvident.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/sucks-for-him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running Away</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/running-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/running-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Life sucks. Divorce life sucks worse. But running away from responsibility solves nothing--no matter how dreadful. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/running-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take some time out of your day…</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/take-some-time-out-of-your-day%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/take-some-time-out-of-your-day%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


By Guest Blogger:  Vazken Kazandjian
While working on a case recently, I went up to the law library at the courthouse to use one of their computers to make corrections to a settlement agreement I had been working on. During my time in the library, I noticed a gentleman with his two children sitting at a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/take-some-time-out-of-your-day%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New case defining income for child support: Show me the money!</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/new-case-defining-income-for-child-support-show-me-the-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/new-case-defining-income-for-child-support-show-me-the-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case really is an extension of the principles explored in In re Marriage of Tegeler, 365 Ill. App. 3d 448 (2nd Dist. 2006) and In re Marriage of Rogers, 213 Ill. 2d 129 (2004)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/new-case-defining-income-for-child-support-show-me-the-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dispelling the Misconception of Physical Separation: Physical Separation Does not Stop The Acquisition of Marital Property</title>
		<link>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/dispelling-the-misconception-of-physical-separation-physical-separation-does-not-stop-the-acquisition-of-marital-property/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/dispelling-the-misconception-of-physical-separation-physical-separation-does-not-stop-the-acquisition-of-marital-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peskind Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Guest Blogger: Gregory C. Maksimuk
Recently I have been asked by several clients what the date for acquiring marital property is and when is it valued.  This has been precipitated by a common misconception that marital property is divided as of the date of physical separation.  What is more troubling is the thrust of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peskindfamilylawinsights.com/dispelling-the-misconception-of-physical-separation-physical-separation-does-not-stop-the-acquisition-of-marital-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

